orphans answered Wednesday June 28 2006, 9:25 pm: id get an ipod, because a lot of ppl have them, and so they can help you with them, and theyre just better in general. that is my opinion though [ orphans's advice column | Ask orphans A Question ]
xxsima answered Wednesday June 28 2006, 7:09 pm: I have a Sony Network Walkman mp3. I'm not sure of how many songs that it can hold. It has a really, really long battery life. I personally think that an Ipod is a waste of money. Just because you can see how long the track is and a calculator and bunches of other useless things. I love my walkman. It was only $100. I'd rather have a mp3 than an Ipod.
HectorJr answered Wednesday June 28 2006, 6:04 pm: For simplicity and less money - an Mp3 player.
For more features and (usually) greater capacity, an iPod.
There are many kinds of Mp3 players that are not iPods but come close, like I guess the Dell DJ. Similar in the sence that you can view songs and has almost the same set up. iPods are in their own class, and personally I think are better if you can afford it. It depends on what you will use it for and how much you will use it.
KT09 answered Wednesday June 28 2006, 6:00 pm: Personally, I love my Mp3 player...It was cheaper than the Ipods I looked at... [ KT09's advice column | Ask KT09 A Question ]
naturally_sadie answered Wednesday June 28 2006, 5:56 pm: Ipods and MP3 players are almost the exact same thing. You can do the same stuff on them. The only big difference is that Ipods are more popular. And someone told me Ipods are better quality. I have an Ipod and I love it! Whatever you buy is going to be fine.
Notso answered Wednesday June 28 2006, 5:47 pm: it depends what you need from your mp3 player. If you only have a couple hundred songs, than obviously an mp3 would be your best and cheapest bet.
If you have videos, and lots of music, well then maybe an iPod is best for you. Or if you have lots of music, but also want to be able to listen to the radio or record audio than you should go with an mp3 (I believe Zen mp3 players have this function).
Another big factor is how hard you would be on your actual mp3 player. I have an iPod video, and it scratches very easily, and cases are fairly expensive. You might want to invest in something a little sturdier if you're going to toss it into your backpack, take it camping whatever. [ Notso's advice column | Ask Notso A Question ]
Cj answered Wednesday June 28 2006, 5:36 pm: an ipod is an mp3 player, the word ipos is just the name of the brand.
They are both cool, but you will probably find other mp3 players cheaper. and money is what matters to most of us. [ Cj's advice column | Ask Cj A Question ]
fabulous11 answered Wednesday June 28 2006, 5:29 pm: well ipod are better becuase tey have much more stuff to doo, like videos picture and stuff. Mp3;s are good because they are cheaper and are if you only want musci. So it depends on what your looking for. [ fabulous11's advice column | Ask fabulous11 A Question ]
orphans answered Wednesday June 28 2006, 5:28 pm: i think Mp3 players are better because some of them can do exactly what an ipod can do if not more. plus, theyre a little cheaper because theyre not extrememly populart like ipods. for example i was goin to get a nano with 1000 songs and i found something cheaper that holds 3000 songs. but it really depends on whos buying it. Mp3's are kinda bad only because the battery but other than that i think theyre a lot better then ipods.
xokristabelle answered Wednesday June 28 2006, 5:16 pm: Ipods are much easier to work with (add music to, etc) and have better customer service. Mp3 players aren't much cheaper anyway. Get the Ipod video if you want something to entertain you on car rides, plane trips, whatever. Nanos are better for running or exercise/dance and carrying around with you everywhere. Also make sure to get applecare (it's like insurance for if it breaks) and check with your regular insurance because they do get stolen or lost a lot. [ xokristabelle's advice column | Ask xokristabelle A Question ]
bAhAmAmA0250 answered Wednesday June 28 2006, 5:15 pm: I think that Ipods are better because you can hold a lot more stuff on them like videos, mini games, alot of songs and its small. Where is a Mp3 player can only hold so much and its big.
I hope that helped you out in some way. [ bAhAmAmA0250's advice column | Ask bAhAmAmA0250 A Question ]
xomegaroni answered Wednesday June 28 2006, 5:14 pm: in my opinion, i think ipods are. they're a bit more expensive, but they're easier to add/delete music, battery lasts longer, holds more songs, etc.
orphans answered Wednesday June 28 2006, 5:12 pm: I think MP3 Players are better. But that's just me. iPods are mainly for fashion; it's what "in" right now. [ orphans's advice column | Ask orphans A Question ]
nessaxyou4evr answered Wednesday June 28 2006, 5:02 pm: umm honestly i think ipods better because it can hold up moree songs then an mp3 and also it can hold pictured(dependind wut ipod your talking about)
Attention: NOTHING on this site may be reproduced in any fashion whatsoever without explicit consent (in writing) of the owner of said material, unless otherwise stated on the page where the content originated. Search engines are free to index and cache our content. Users who post their account names or personal information in their questions have no expectation of privacy beyond that point for anything they disclose. Questions are otherwise considered anonymous to the general public.