Free AdviceGet Free Advice
Home | Get advice | Give advice | Topics | Columnists | - !START HERE! -
Make Suggestions | Sitemap

Get Advice


Search Questions

Ask A Question

Browse Advice Columnists

Search Advice Columnists

Chat Room

Give Advice

View Questions
Search Questions
Advice Topics

Login

Username:
Password:
Remember me
Register for free!
Lost Password?

Want to give Advice?

Sign Up Now
(It's FREE!)

Miscellaneous

Shirts and Stuff
Page Backgrounds
Make Suggestions
Site News
Link To Us
About Us
Terms of Service
Help/FAQ
Sitemap
Contact Us


am i insane to think like this?


Question Posted Friday July 25 2008, 6:21 pm

do you think it would be better if all men died out and only their sperm was saved so the female population would die out? We could eat the men and also reduce world hunger. Just think, Bush and Cheney would be gone along with all those other assholes. We could keep the gay, sensitive ones for the sperm, right?

what a perfect world it would be.

what do you think?


[ Answer this question ]
Want to answer more questions in the Health & Fitness category?
Maybe give some free advice about: Mental health?


K3587 answered Tuesday March 23 2010, 11:43 pm:
No, the world would be filled with irrationality and everyone's money would go towards buying purses and shoes.

You'd all be dead in a week.

[ K3587's advice column | Ask K3587 A Question
]




karenR answered Monday March 22 2010, 7:37 am:
am i insane to think like this?

I certainly feel you are.

[ karenR's advice column | Ask karenR A Question
]



WittyUsernameHere answered Sunday March 21 2010, 5:35 am:
Ahh to be young and naive again.

2000 years ago, the Catholic church waged a campaign to villify both sex and women. It's continued through everything from witch burnings to the transformation from women into marital property.

The net effect has been 2000 years of a world dominated by war and aggression.

A female world would go much the same. Out of balance, spinning out of control until everything collapses or people start to see sense and work more towards some form of equality.

Man and women are two parts of a whole, not separate entities. This is true both physiologically and psychologically. Men and women, or rather masculine and feminine balance each other. Even in homosexual relationships, this is generally true, as one partner identifies as more masculine and the other more feminine.

Women are just as lost without men as men are without women. Are you insane? Not really. Are you naive? Certainly.

And to answer Leah's list of what women have over men, there's plenty to go on the other side. Men have a drive that women do not, we are naturally more tenacious, more aggressive, and contrary to what women believe men work far, far better in a group of same sex people. Women talk things out because they must, and have to solve problems before they can work well as a team. If problems can't be solved, then the team doesn't work (I've watched this time and again in the real world)

Men, on the other hand, logically set aside and ignore problems and focus on the task at hand.

Also, I can pee anywhere.

If the two sides of the mind are logic and emotion, then men are logic and women are emotion. Each is better than the other depending on the situation.

Each has traits which are desirable, the trick is to figure out that you're supposed to try to balance both. Since men can't function fully on an emotional level and women cannot work solely off logic, they need each others perspectives to keep themselves in balance.

[ WittyUsernameHere's advice column | Ask WittyUsernameHere A Question
]



leah87 answered Saturday March 20 2010, 10:50 pm:
I have to agree as well. Why does everything have man in it?! woMAN, huMANity, alMANac, MANager, adaMANt, roMANce, comMANd, deMANds, etc. There are MANy more words containing those three letters in a row.
More like MANiacs. lol
Are they really that important? Reasons we should dominate: We carry the children. We can live without them whereas men would be completely lost without some form of a woman. We only have one head to think with so our decisions are not as biased. Plus women are more comforting and better at talking through issues with each other than men are. Studies have proven that as evolution goes on women have continued to be born more attractive while men have stayed the same..haha. Since recession hit 80% of jobs lost have been men. Females graduate college more often than men and in less time than it takes a male. Estrogen helps to fight off infections hence we have a stronger immune system. We live longer than men on average. Women are typically more cautious with their investment decisions and think longer term meaning we actually run business more efficiently. We can have multiple orgasms and multitask. There are many more but I think thats enough evidence for now :)

[ leah87's advice column | Ask leah87 A Question
]



braytak answered Saturday March 20 2010, 10:45 pm:
oh come on, you would miss us, wink.

it wouldn't be perfect, you wouldn't have anyone to complain about except other women....hehehehe

there is a great website for battle of the sexes jokes at:

[Link](Mouse over link to see full location)

[ braytak's advice column | Ask braytak A Question
]



Michele answered Saturday March 20 2010, 10:20 pm:
Man, I hate to admit it, but I LIKE that idea!
I have felt that way myself, but couldn't put it into words. And I have been on this planet 57 years, so I know.

Maybe one day, women will run this plant, and then education, health care and clean drinking water will be more important than war, sports and beer.

Oh Oh. this is like..... turning into a blog.

Michele

[ Michele's advice column | Ask Michele A Question
]



ASAPcamille answered Saturday July 26 2008, 10:26 am:
First of all: Not all guys are like Bush and Cheney.
Secondly: Eating men is bad.
Third: Women seem to disagree a lot, so there would be a lot of bickering.

It would be far from a perfect world...and you should not devour men for dinner.

[ ASAPcamille's advice column | Ask ASAPcamille A Question
]



LOL_x0x answered Saturday July 26 2008, 12:04 am:
I don't like this idea. A world full of only women would be filled with mean people. Think of the ENTIRE world PMSing. Not good at all =O


-Laura. (16-f)

[ LOL_x0x's advice column | Ask LOL_x0x A Question
]



es answered Friday July 25 2008, 11:01 pm:
as hard as it is to believe, not all guys are assholes. and the ones that aren't are worth keeping around =]]

[ es's advice column | Ask es A Question
]



xkellxx answered Friday July 25 2008, 10:24 pm:
You are a little insane. sorry.

[ xkellxx's advice column | Ask xkellxx A Question
]



Cux answered Friday July 25 2008, 6:35 pm:
Obviously, being a guy, I disagree with this. God intended two sexes for a reason.

Yes, you could save our sperm, but eventually it would run out. Oh, and you might have a hard time controlling the sexes of the babies, with or without technology.

--Jack
(16/m)

[ Cux's advice column | Ask Cux A Question
]



Annerszz_101 answered Friday July 25 2008, 6:34 pm:
o_O
alright well.

I'm not that religious, but Men were put here before women, and so technically it would be going against God, so it wouldn't be such a perfect world.

And eating the men? That's kinda weird, and bloody, and gross.

So you're insane, just creative?
But no, I wouldn't like a world like this.


hope i helped? let me know.

[ Annerszz_101's advice column | Ask Annerszz_101 A Question
]

More Questions:

<<< Previous Question: Should/can I get my husband back
Next Question >>> Religious Objection

Recent popular questions:
Want to give advice?

Click here to start your own advice column!

What happened here with my gamer friends?

All content on this page posted by members of advicenators.com is the responsibility those individual members. Other content © 2003-2014 advicenators.com. We do not promise accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any advice and are not responsible for content.

Attention: NOTHING on this site may be reproduced in any fashion whatsoever without explicit consent (in writing) of the owner of said material, unless otherwise stated on the page where the content originated. Search engines are free to index and cache our content.
Users who post their account names or personal information in their questions have no expectation of privacy beyond that point for anything they disclose. Questions are otherwise considered anonymous to the general public.

[Valid RSS] eXTReMe Tracker