do you think it would be better if all men died out and only their sperm was saved so the female population would die out? We could eat the men and also reduce world hunger. Just think, Bush and Cheney would be gone along with all those other assholes. We could keep the gay, sensitive ones for the sperm, right?
WittyUsernameHere answered Sunday March 21 2010, 5:35 am: Ahh to be young and naive again.
2000 years ago, the Catholic church waged a campaign to villify both sex and women. It's continued through everything from witch burnings to the transformation from women into marital property.
The net effect has been 2000 years of a world dominated by war and aggression.
A female world would go much the same. Out of balance, spinning out of control until everything collapses or people start to see sense and work more towards some form of equality.
Man and women are two parts of a whole, not separate entities. This is true both physiologically and psychologically. Men and women, or rather masculine and feminine balance each other. Even in homosexual relationships, this is generally true, as one partner identifies as more masculine and the other more feminine.
Women are just as lost without men as men are without women. Are you insane? Not really. Are you naive? Certainly.
And to answer Leah's list of what women have over men, there's plenty to go on the other side. Men have a drive that women do not, we are naturally more tenacious, more aggressive, and contrary to what women believe men work far, far better in a group of same sex people. Women talk things out because they must, and have to solve problems before they can work well as a team. If problems can't be solved, then the team doesn't work (I've watched this time and again in the real world)
Men, on the other hand, logically set aside and ignore problems and focus on the task at hand.
Also, I can pee anywhere.
If the two sides of the mind are logic and emotion, then men are logic and women are emotion. Each is better than the other depending on the situation.
Each has traits which are desirable, the trick is to figure out that you're supposed to try to balance both. Since men can't function fully on an emotional level and women cannot work solely off logic, they need each others perspectives to keep themselves in balance. [ WittyUsernameHere's advice column | Ask WittyUsernameHere A Question ]
leah87 answered Saturday March 20 2010, 10:50 pm: I have to agree as well. Why does everything have man in it?! woMAN, huMANity, alMANac, MANager, adaMANt, roMANce, comMANd, deMANds, etc. There are MANy more words containing those three letters in a row.
More like MANiacs. lol
Are they really that important? Reasons we should dominate: We carry the children. We can live without them whereas men would be completely lost without some form of a woman. We only have one head to think with so our decisions are not as biased. Plus women are more comforting and better at talking through issues with each other than men are. Studies have proven that as evolution goes on women have continued to be born more attractive while men have stayed the same..haha. Since recession hit 80% of jobs lost have been men. Females graduate college more often than men and in less time than it takes a male. Estrogen helps to fight off infections hence we have a stronger immune system. We live longer than men on average. Women are typically more cautious with their investment decisions and think longer term meaning we actually run business more efficiently. We can have multiple orgasms and multitask. There are many more but I think thats enough evidence for now :) [ leah87's advice column | Ask leah87 A Question ]
braytak answered Saturday March 20 2010, 10:45 pm: oh come on, you would miss us, wink.
it wouldn't be perfect, you wouldn't have anyone to complain about except other women....hehehehe
there is a great website for battle of the sexes jokes at:
Michele answered Saturday March 20 2010, 10:20 pm: Man, I hate to admit it, but I LIKE that idea!
I have felt that way myself, but couldn't put it into words. And I have been on this planet 57 years, so I know.
Maybe one day, women will run this plant, and then education, health care and clean drinking water will be more important than war, sports and beer.
ASAPcamille answered Saturday July 26 2008, 10:26 am: First of all: Not all guys are like Bush and Cheney.
Secondly: Eating men is bad.
Third: Women seem to disagree a lot, so there would be a lot of bickering.
LOL_x0x answered Saturday July 26 2008, 12:04 am: I don't like this idea. A world full of only women would be filled with mean people. Think of the ENTIRE world PMSing. Not good at all =O
es answered Friday July 25 2008, 11:01 pm: as hard as it is to believe, not all guys are assholes. and the ones that aren't are worth keeping around =]] [ es's advice column | Ask es A Question ]
Cux answered Friday July 25 2008, 6:35 pm: Obviously, being a guy, I disagree with this. God intended two sexes for a reason.
Yes, you could save our sperm, but eventually it would run out. Oh, and you might have a hard time controlling the sexes of the babies, with or without technology.
Attention: NOTHING on this site may be reproduced in any fashion whatsoever without explicit consent (in writing) of the owner of said material, unless otherwise stated on the page where the content originated. Search engines are free to index and cache our content. Users who post their account names or personal information in their questions have no expectation of privacy beyond that point for anything they disclose. Questions are otherwise considered anonymous to the general public.