I've been wondering how many people that are not in the adult industry view this as a bad thing. Some of my girls have complained before about not always wanting to work as an escort because of some of the clients. Girls are always free do go as they please so it isn't anything like that. I would like to know how people view Las Vegas escorts and the adult industry?
[ Answer this question ] Want to answer more questions in the Relationships category? Maybe give some free advice about: Abusive Relationships? rainhorse68 answered Thursday October 16 2014, 11:55 am: Genuine or not, that question is similar to poking a hornets nest with a stick I reckon. Perosnal view? Well it has every claim to being the worlds oldest profession, and while there are punters wililing to pay there will be working girls, whatever the collective public opinion of the age tends towards. And that has varied greatly too over the years. I believe where it involves human trafficking and exploitation of either illegal, or vulnerable immigrants it is ethically and morally wrong on all levels. Street-prostitution so often goes hand in hand with drugs. The people who run the girls will target vulnerable women and get them hooked on drugs (supplied free of charge) then withdraw the free supply and leaving them with a costly habit which they can only hope to pay for by working as prostitutes for them. Sorry, I think this is vile. I do not think THE GIRLS are vile, they are victims. And thus the argument that prostitution is a 'victimles crime' falls apart. The adult industry pivots (for me) entirely on a comment you make yourself. Namely, whether the girls are free to come and go as they please and choose the services they offer....or not. The whole 'escort' thing, particularly the higher paid end usually fits this brief. Whether the girls work from home, via incalls or outcalls or at a 'parlour'. Any women I have known and spoken to who work as escorts will confirm another of your comments. Some clients are nice guys and 'OK' to entertain. Some are assholes. But the environment tends to put the woman in control. And punters are generally NOT aggressive and violent characters. More likely to be the complete opposite in fact. This last bit seems to apply right through the spectrum, as street-prostitutes are in theory INCREDIBLY vulnerable. Yet prostitutes are not frequently roughed-up (or murdered, which would be relatively simple given their working environment and conditions) by punters. They're actually more likely to get beaten by their pimps. So overal I tend to think that although in all cases the ACT is the same (sexual services in return for money) there are divisions between what I (and the public at large) find accpetable and to what degree. And the line is almost certainly defined by the difference between a free, self-determined act and that of exploitation. Is a highly paid escort not exploting the punter for income as much as HE is exploiting HER for sexual gratification? Possibly a mix of both. And the relationship can exist where both parties are 'happy with the deal' as it were. Mutually beneficial. The woman CAN leave the industry, and the punter COULD decide not to visit her. [ rainhorse68's advice column | Ask rainhorse68 A Question ]
adviceman49 answered Thursday October 16 2014, 10:15 am: First I find it hard to believe the owner of an escort service would come to this sight for answers to this question. So to the enterprising young person thinking moving to Nevada where Prostitution is legal just about in all Counties; EXCEPT CLARK COUNTY WHERE LAS VEGAS IS LOCATED. I'll provide you with my take on the subject.
While I was stationed in the military I often thought of taking advantage of the available legal prostitution. In the end though I found the thought of buying sex repugnant.
As I have grown older my feeling towards legalized prostitution is it probably has it place in todays society though that doesn't mean it is not demeaning to the women who practice it.
I've watched the HBO specials about the Bunny Ranch and listen to the girls who are doing so to pay for their education, some to get PHD and using their experience to write their thesis or so they say. I'm sure the clients that paid the big money, the ones we were shown, are not the majority of their clientele.
Most likely the majority of their clients paid anywhere from $150 to $300 half of which go to the house. That is not a lot of money to expose oneself to all the diseases they can come in contact with. Condoms are only effective against HIV/AIDS and some STD. The girls only use the condoms for intercourse. What about oral sex, same exposure risk, no protection.
These girls are young, are shown only the exciting high end of the business. When in actuality they could have multiple bookings a night. Tell me they are different then the brothel girls and not being exploited. [ adviceman49's advice column | Ask adviceman49 A Question ]
storageanddisposal answered Thursday October 16 2014, 5:53 am: Oh yes. I entirely believe that the owner of Sin City Escorts Las Vegas came to a site called advicenators and asked a poorly phrased question concerning the morality of the adult industry.
Razhie answered Thursday October 16 2014, 1:16 am: Advertising adult services is not an appropriate use of this site.
Where prostitution is illegal - like it in Clark County Las Vegas - sex work isn't safe. Escorts might not like to be called sex workers, but that doesn't mean they don't understand exactly what is happening when someone pays a $1000 for an 'over night package'. There are certainly people who exist who will spend that amount of money on a sleepover and a cuddle with a pretty lady, but it's not the majority of your clientele, and you know it.
They know what they are doing, and so do you. Fuck you to hell and back for saying "It's not anything like that." It is EXACTLY like that. Your clients know what they are buying, your workers know what they are selling, and everyone knows what is expected.
You are selling sex, and you are selling sex in a place where selling sex is illegal. The only reason you don't admit you are selling sex, is because it's illegal. That means these women have no legal protections, and that what they are doing is extremely dangerous and leaves them far too often at the mercy of men who buy a woman's time and think that means they own her body.
Of course some clients can be problems - really dangerous problems - for your 'girls'. (Try calling them women, or employees if you want to even pretend to be anything other than a lowlife pimp). Your clients know they can get away with behaving badly, even criminally, with their 'escorts' because prostitution is illegal, and the women cannot seek the protections they deserve from the law when they are in that line of work.
Don't pretend to be an idiot just because it's convenient for you. I happen to believe that prostitution should be legal. These women would be safer if it was, and dumbasses like you wouldn't find it so easy to make a buck off of your 'girls' while lying to yourself about "it isn't anything like that." [ Razhie's advice column | Ask Razhie A Question ]
Attention: NOTHING on this site may be reproduced in any fashion whatsoever without explicit consent (in writing) of the owner of said material, unless otherwise stated on the page where the content originated. Search engines are free to index and cache our content. Users who post their account names or personal information in their questions have no expectation of privacy beyond that point for anything they disclose. Questions are otherwise considered anonymous to the general public.