Don't get an ipod. There are a lot of other brands of mp3 players that work way better than ipods. Seriously, ipods break ALL the time!! Get a Zen or something. [ tasuki's advice column | Ask tasuki A Question ]
orphans answered Saturday January 14 2006, 12:36 pm: i think it holda about 100-150.
i think it costs like 200 dollars, and my friend got one. She really really likes it and listens to it alot.. like non-stop.. & doesn't ever complain about it. So i'd say it is, but that's my opinion! :) [ orphans's advice column | Ask orphans A Question ]
DirtySchmageggie answered Saturday January 14 2006, 12:29 am: It holds about 100 songs. My brother has one that he uses for on the subway and walking to work. It has it's advantages and disadvantages. Disadvantages are that it only holds 100 songs and you cannot choose which song you want to listen to next. Advantages are you can always add and remove songs from your shuffle on your itunes and you can set a certain order you want the music in instead of the shuffle choosing for you. It really just depends on what you want from it. If you're looking for something that holds TONS of music that you don't have to update often then it is clearly not for you. But if you think it will be convenient to keep your favorite 100 or so songs on you at all times then go for it. [ DirtySchmageggie's advice column | Ask DirtySchmageggie A Question ]
orphans answered Friday January 13 2006, 9:45 pm: I have the shuffle.
i dont like it at all i havnt even added over 50 songs on it.
then i have the nano and mini... dont get the mini because it has many problems.
the nano is really good (im listening to it now) but the sound isnt as good.
then my sister has the video - its really bad bc you look at a 3 inch screeen, then you go to the movie thearter and get blind from the like color. that the ipod doesnt have and it like does something it was on the news.
and my friend has the regular ipod- if you like alot of music get that.
jj_u_i_c_y answered Friday January 13 2006, 8:04 pm: The ipod is a flash player so it has no hardrive which means it doesn't skip and there is one which is 99$ and hols 120 songs, the other 129$ 240 songs. i dont think its worth it, its about 50 cents per song if you think about it, why spend 129$ for 240 songs rather than 200$ for 500 songs so i dont think its worth it.
xOx_BRUN3TT3_xOx answered Friday January 13 2006, 5:49 pm: It's about 100 and over dollars and it can have about 200 song on there ! To me it really isn't worth it because i rather buy some clothes sre somthing but w/e you want fine with me lol !
fabulous11 answered Friday January 13 2006, 5:30 pm: its like 100$ and its hold 200 songs or somthing. I dont really think they are wrth it. My friedn has one its kinda stupid. Just save up for a better one. Or just get a mp3 player they are just as good and some are cheeper.
janelle<3 answered Friday January 13 2006, 3:43 pm: it cost 99.99 it holds 200 songs...personally i dont think its worth it...i think its more worth it to save up for a nano or video ipod. [ janelle<3's advice column | Ask janelle<3 A Question ]
DancinCutie08 answered Friday January 13 2006, 3:09 pm: its $100 and holds i believe about 100 songs.. i recommend the nano.. its $100 more but it holds over 500 songs i believe.. thats what i have but i only currently have 30 on it
edit: i found this on the web site
240 song refers to 1GB model. 512 MB model (up to 120 songs).
Attention: NOTHING on this site may be reproduced in any fashion whatsoever without explicit consent (in writing) of the owner of said material, unless otherwise stated on the page where the content originated. Search engines are free to index and cache our content. Users who post their account names or personal information in their questions have no expectation of privacy beyond that point for anything they disclose. Questions are otherwise considered anonymous to the general public.