|
|
Okay this is directed to Republicans/those who support President Bush (Don't take this as my attempt to bash anybody or any political group, I'm merely curious...also dont take this as me generalizing, I'm not saying EVERY SINGLE REPUBLICAN believes all these)
1. Do you honestly, truly believe that in the short term the Iraq War's main purpose is to liberate Iraquis, or to preserve a stable oil supply from the Middle East?
2. How can you say that it is completely and utterly unethical to allow a woman to have control over her body and have an abortion, while at the same time supporting that the state does away with prisoners with the Death Penalty?
3. Do you think homosexuals were born inferior to heterosexuals and do not deserve the same rights as them simply because of whom they choose to love?
4. Why do you believe that responding to terrorism by reducing the freedom of Americans is anything other than giving the terrorists exactly what they want?
5. Why are antiwar protesters deemed unpatriotic, but pro-war people praised?
Again, my goal is not to offend anybody. I just want honest opinions.
I'm going to answer your questions as best as I can, though I don't understand a few of them.
1) I believe that the purpose of the Iraq War war was to liberate Iraquis AND to preserve a stable oil supply AND to make an example of the terrorists in Iraq. So, yes and no, I guess.
2) I don't think that abortion laws can be equated with the death penalty. I think that if abortion is legal, then your can't give someone two murder charges for killing a pregnant woman. My view is that if you charge someone with an extra murder charge for the death of the fetus, you are then valuing the fetus as life, which means that abortion laws saying that a fetus does not have a life are invalid. I'm not yet sure how I feel either way about it, but I do know that you cannot logically have both pro-abortion laws along with murder charges for the death of a fetus. Then every mother who had an abortion would, by law, be guilty of murder. Do you see what I'm saying?
3. I don't entirely understand the wording of this one...I don't think that homosexuals were "born" infereior, because I don't think someone is born hetero- or homosexual. I don't know how to answer the rest of the question.
4. I also don't understand this one. Examples would help some.
5. And for this one I just don't have an opinion.
So, I hope that you appreciate that I took the time to try to answer, and that my answers don't offend you, because that was not my goal.
4.
[view]
(Rating: 4)
I dont agree with much of what you said, but thankyou for answering :)
| |
