Free AdviceGet Free Advice
Home | Get advice | Give advice | Topics | Columnists | - !START HERE! -
Make Suggestions | Sitemap

Get Advice


Search Questions

Ask A Question

Browse Advice Columnists

Search Advice Columnists

Chat Room

Give Advice

View Questions
Search Questions
Advice Topics

Login

Username:
Password:
Remember me
Register for free!
Lost Password?

Want to give Advice?

Sign Up Now
(It's FREE!)

Miscellaneous

Shirts and Stuff
Page Backgrounds
Make Suggestions
Site News
Link To Us
About Us
Terms of Service
Help/FAQ
Sitemap
Contact Us


Polyamory?


Question Posted Friday May 16 2008, 1:25 am

Exactly how does one know they are polyamorous? Is it just a cop-out term to justify cheating, or is it a real condition?

[ Answer this question ]
Want to answer more questions in the Relationships category?
Maybe give some free advice about: Love Life?


WittyUsernameHere answered Sunday May 18 2008, 8:41 pm:
Cheating is defined as going outside the sexual or intimacy boundaries set down in the relationship. If kissing someone else isn't ok, then doing that is cheating.

Polyamory is when you have few or no boundaries there, and so its not cheating at all. The trick to it, is that polyamorous people in those kinds of relationships, it has to be co-operation. Both people have to want that.

But yes, it is real.

[ WittyUsernameHere's advice column | Ask WittyUsernameHere A Question
]




Razhie answered Friday May 16 2008, 11:49 am:
I don't think it is quite right to say you that you can know that you are polyamorous, the same way you can know that you are homosexual.

Sexual attraction is something we can't control or choose for ourselves. The relationships we choose to be in is something we can control and choose. Our personal definition of love is under our complete control. We can choose how we love other people and define and limit that loving relationship.

I know there are some people who identify as being polyamorous who believe they were just 'born that way' but I honestly don't agree with that. It might be their personal preference, but we aren't 'born' knowing how we will choose to related to human beings romantically and define our relationships. To say you were born polyamorous is like saying you were born racist… Relating to people, either loving them or hating them, is a learned behavior. Not one you are born with. We know that human neurology isn’t like that.

Is it a cop-out? It certainly could be used that way, but I think there is a distinction to be made between people who simply are romantically in love with more then one person at once, and people who choose to live a polyamorous life style and have that arrangement with their partners.

People who are in love with more then one other person, are, by definition, polyamorous, but they are not necessarily living their lives that way or being honest about their feelings. If they are cheating, they are cheating and betraying and lying to partners. Period. They might say they are polyamorous, but that is no excuse or explanation for their bad behavior. If they have lied and betrayed, then they have lied and betrayed. No explanation will change or justify that.

The other kind of polyamorous person would be honest with any partner from the beginning about their belief and interest in being romantically in love with more the one person at once.

So you see, it’s not really the difference between a polyamorous person and a monogamous person that is the most important aspect, it’s the difference between a liar and a truthful person.

Well, and of course, what YOU want in a relationship arrangement. That is most important thing to know and be honest about.

[ Razhie's advice column | Ask Razhie A Question
]



looneytune1561 answered Friday May 16 2008, 10:01 am:
pertaining to partipation in multiple and simultaneous loving or sexual relationships.

[ looneytune1561's advice column | Ask looneytune1561 A Question
]



GilbertMar answered Friday May 16 2008, 4:22 am:
Good question,

It would be my contention that until recent times, man has not been monogamous, where women, (for the most part), have been so. Until reliable birth control, women it seems to me, had made little demands on their husbands to be "faithful". The reason being, they did not want to get pregnant, they were more then willing to let others take that risk. Is there a difference between a condition and a habit? Can you erase thousands of years of this kind of behavior in a mater of generations? It doesn't help when we have attitudes like, "oh, he's just sowing his wild oats", or we excuse such behavior as, "that's just the way guys are". Or the father that give his son the ataboy when he scores with the good looking cheerleader. Is it a condition, one could argue that.

Thanks for the thought provoking question, Be well.

I find it interesting that you ask a question that is not advise, but opinion. Yet you rate that OPINION and do so with such a mediocre rating. If you are going to ask such questions, don't rate them. I will not make the mistake of answering an opinion question again

[ GilbertMar's advice column | Ask GilbertMar A Question
]

More Questions:

<<< Previous Question: streachmarks?
Next Question >>> good age/stage of life for serious dating

Recent popular questions:
Want to give advice?

Click here to start your own advice column!

What happened here with my gamer friends?

All content on this page posted by members of advicenators.com is the responsibility those individual members. Other content © 2003-2014 advicenators.com. We do not promise accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any advice and are not responsible for content.

Attention: NOTHING on this site may be reproduced in any fashion whatsoever without explicit consent (in writing) of the owner of said material, unless otherwise stated on the page where the content originated. Search engines are free to index and cache our content.
Users who post their account names or personal information in their questions have no expectation of privacy beyond that point for anything they disclose. Questions are otherwise considered anonymous to the general public.

[Valid RSS] eXTReMe Tracker