The other day I answered someone's question. And in that question I stated that ovulation can also occur after a person's period. ( 6-14 days) which I googled and found out I was right. Another person wrote my advice column to dispute this fact, but turns out she didnt dispute it al all: here is that she said word for word: Oh, and no you are not fertile AFTER your period you fucking idiot. You are not fertile UNTIL 14 DAYS AFTER YOUR PERIOD. Get your facts right. Now does everyone see that she said your NOT fertile AFTER your period, its 14 days AFTER your period! Duh thats what I said! Why do people resort to name calling when trying to dispute something? or is it just this person doesnt posess any class? 5's for all thoughts.. except for her's.
JustAsk answered Friday April 28 2006, 10:09 pm: Hey, I totally agree with you she really should not be name calling you can argue with out being offensive. She also needs to pay attention to what shes arguing about before she argues. Lol dont feel bad its her problem not yours.
ScratchesOnTheWall answered Friday April 28 2006, 1:26 pm: I'm aware I'm likely to get a 1 for this but what on earth are you hoping to achieve by posting this question? As far as I can see this is a rant with a quick couple of rhetorical questions on the end so that it can technically be counted as a something requiring an answer from columnists so it hopefully won't be deleted.
You were right, she was rude, congratulations, but that's life and I fail to understand why you need the validation of a bunch of anonymous people the other end of a computer to feel vindicated.
Chicken_flavored_eggs answered Friday April 28 2006, 12:09 am: Heh, this is funny. My boyfriend actually has a theory on this. I was re-reading it just today.
I will summarize for you.
Normal person + anonymity + audience = shitcock.
"So you see, given me, a normal person, plus the anonymity of the internet, plus you as an audience, I will sooner or later degenerate into a total "shitcock". That's right. This is a scientific law, proven by all kinds of observations. However, until now, no one could feasibly explain why this equation held true, or why so many people on the internet were such ridiculous fuckholes."
He goes on to say how internet asshats will either drive away the nice people, or turn them into asshats themselves. If you think about it, it is true. When someone is a dick to you online your first reaction is to curse them out. That turns you into an asshat as well. Given enough exposure to shitcocks, either you join them, or go away.
This leaves only the shitcock asshats to roam the communities and websites once populated by nice people. Anonymity and an audience can turn someone into a total fuckhole. I would assume that is what happened with this idiot.
She attacked you when you were right. I wouldn't put much stock into what she says. She doesn't even understand basic ovulation. And she is a FEMALE. You can't put much weight on the rantings of an asshat shitcock fuckhole.
loves2shop86 answered Thursday April 27 2006, 11:26 pm: hey! yeah i know what you're talking about... just seriously don't even worry about it and don't let it bother you. yeah it's annoying and rude and completely uncalled for, but some people just don't understand. even though you were right, that person was under the impression that you were wrong... maybe they read into what you wrote in a different way than you intended or something! so basically once they thought that you were wrong and they had the right answer, they felt better than you... and once they felt better than you, they figured they have the right to treat you like crap and call you by degrading names. it's all psychological and they were just trying to talk themselves into thinking that they are smarter, better, etc. not much you can do about it other than ignore it... as long as you know the truth, that's all that matters! :) [ loves2shop86's advice column | Ask loves2shop86 A Question ]
Attention: NOTHING on this site may be reproduced in any fashion whatsoever without explicit consent (in writing) of the owner of said material, unless otherwise stated on the page where the content originated. Search engines are free to index and cache our content. Users who post their account names or personal information in their questions have no expectation of privacy beyond that point for anything they disclose. Questions are otherwise considered anonymous to the general public.