Contrast Rainsford and Zaroff of "The Most Dangerous Game"
Question Posted Monday September 28 2009, 7:01 pm
I'm writing and essay on comparing and contrasting Rainsford and Zaroff, and I'm having some troubles with the difference. Obviously, I know that Rainsford hunts animals while Zaroff hunts people. I also have that while Rainsford values human life, Zaroff does not. I need to find two more.
Does anyone have any other ideas?
[ Answer this question ] Want to answer more questions in the Work & School category? Maybe give some free advice about: School? hitler_the_goat answered Tuesday September 29 2009, 2:29 am: both characters are similar, and have similar interests, but different prey. though I might add that rainsford seemed like the type that would be more straightforwrd about killing his prey, while zaroff seems to play with it like a cat. sort of a psychological intimidation, his prey is sentient(in that it knows its being hunted and is under a ridiculous amount of mental stress because of it). zaroff knows this, and makes it a factor to increase his own pleasure. also, look at the weapon that zaroff uses; its barely adequate for the task, whereas rainsford would use large caliber rifles to hunt animals for more reasons than just hunting larger prey. a 50 caliber elephant gun back in the day could bring down an elephant easily over medium distances with less targeting discipline than you would need to bring down a human with a .22
his weapon choice is made to make the hunt more even, closer, and more personal, so that he can have a better, more intimate relationship with his prey, whilst rainsford would just blast the cape buffalo, or whatever he's hunting, from a safer distance. he's looking for trophies, while zaroff is looking for the thrill. two entirely different things.
course, the last time I read this story was in 1999.
-Gunner. [ hitler_the_goat's advice column | Ask hitler_the_goat A Question ]
es answered Monday September 28 2009, 8:56 pm: Their psychology contrasts. Zaroff finds what he is doing completely normal. He sees hunting people as a game rather than murder. And this, to him is completely sane. Rainsford, obviously sees it as insanity.
Memorex answered Monday September 28 2009, 8:13 pm: Hmmm... I'd say Zaroff is slightly crazy while Rainsford is not....
Zaroff also seemed to be more intelligent then Rainsford, a better hunter. He knew where Rainsford was immediately, but he left him alone for the thrill of it. [ Memorex's advice column | Ask Memorex A Question ]
Attention: NOTHING on this site may be reproduced in any fashion whatsoever without explicit consent (in writing) of the owner of said material, unless otherwise stated on the page where the content originated. Search engines are free to index and cache our content. Users who post their account names or personal information in their questions have no expectation of privacy beyond that point for anything they disclose. Questions are otherwise considered anonymous to the general public.