Free AdviceGet Free Advice
Home | Get advice | Give advice | Topics | Columnists | - !START HERE! -
Make Suggestions | Sitemap

Get Advice


Search Questions

Ask A Question

Browse Advice Columnists

Search Advice Columnists

Chat Room

Give Advice

View Questions
Search Questions
Advice Topics

Login

Username:
Password:
Remember me
Register for free!
Lost Password?

Want to give Advice?

Sign Up Now
(It's FREE!)

Miscellaneous

Shirts and Stuff
Page Backgrounds
Make Suggestions
Site News
Link To Us
About Us
Terms of Service
Help/FAQ
Sitemap
Contact Us


SAT vs. ACT


Question Posted Wednesday July 29 2009, 3:05 pm

I'm going to be a senior next year and am beginning my college application process. I'm applying to some competitive liberal arts schools and have some questions about the SAT vs. ACT. I took the SAT as a sophomore and got a 2260 without studying really. But then I took two SAT subject tests and did poorly (not terrible, but one i was in the 90th percentile and one i was in the 65th percentile, so not great considering where I am applying). The schools require either SAT and SAT subject tests, OR ACT. My question is, would it be better to take the ACT, which i would probably do well on because that type of reasoning, like the SAT, comes easily to me. Or should i just submit my good sAT scores and not great subject tests scores.

Thank you!


[ Answer this question ]
Want to answer more questions in the Work & School category?
Maybe give some free advice about: Colleges & Universities?


Matt answered Thursday July 30 2009, 2:00 am:
Your only reason for taking the ACT is so you don't have to submit your SAT II scores, correct? That logic doesn't apply for all situations. It varies school to school on their policies on the SAT II combined with the ACT. Some actually still require the SAT II even if you do take the ACT. Because you're a senior and already got a Jesus score on the SAT, I'm sure you already have a group of colleges mapped out, so you should call their admissions offices just to make sure.


Personally, I'd just retake the SAT IIs again. You've got what, two or three more chances? I took the SAT and ACT. While neither are the cool place to be on a Saturday, the ACT is a piece of shit test compared to the SAT. One ten minute break in the middle, essay at the end. The SAT caters to a better chance to show what you know (that rhymes, obviously I know what I'm talking about). Honestly, you're SAT II isn't going to impact you too negatively when you're walking around with a 2260. If your grades are good and you have your extra currics, you're all set.


Enjoy the next few months, college apps suck pretty hard.

[ Matt's advice column | Ask Matt A Question
]




LOL_x0x answered Wednesday July 29 2009, 10:15 pm:
I agree with Jack, I think you should take the ACT. What have you go to lose?


If you did that good on the SAT, you'd probably do well on the ACT. And it would show that you're a hard worker and that you were willing to take both :)


-Laura (17-f)

[ LOL_x0x's advice column | Ask LOL_x0x A Question
]



Cux answered Wednesday July 29 2009, 8:56 pm:
I really know nothing about the SAT.

But, I think it's worth it to take the ACT. Make sure you take the ACT Plus Writing, because some schools require that, plus, why not? lol

Anyway, I really think you should take the ACT.

--Jack
(17/m)

[ Cux's advice column | Ask Cux A Question
]

More Questions:

<<< Previous Question: Random hookup one night.
Next Question >>> I feel like the unwanted "little sister"

Recent popular questions:
Want to give advice?

Click here to start your own advice column!

What happened here with my gamer friends?

All content on this page posted by members of advicenators.com is the responsibility those individual members. Other content © 2003-2014 advicenators.com. We do not promise accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any advice and are not responsible for content.

Attention: NOTHING on this site may be reproduced in any fashion whatsoever without explicit consent (in writing) of the owner of said material, unless otherwise stated on the page where the content originated. Search engines are free to index and cache our content.
Users who post their account names or personal information in their questions have no expectation of privacy beyond that point for anything they disclose. Questions are otherwise considered anonymous to the general public.

[Valid RSS] eXTReMe Tracker