Ok so me and a good guy friend have been friends with benefits for awhile. It used to be just making out but recently we've been dryhumping a lot. He wants me to give him a handjob and he also wants to touch my boobs and stuff but I said it was against my morals. Am I being hypocritical that I'm dry-humping but won't let him touch me under my clothes? Which is usually considered more serious?
karenR answered Tuesday May 15 2007, 1:21 pm: I'm sure you won't like this but my advice is to stop the "friends with benefits" all together.
Any kind of sexual touching is serious. You are being serious with someone who doesn't care enough to even make you his girlfriend.
You are still a virgin. But honestly, if you feel
you must continue being friends with benefits, don't let it go any farther. One step leads to another
and before long you will be doing even MORE serious things.
NinaB answered Tuesday May 15 2007, 12:49 pm: Your moral character is way more important than what he wants. It may seem to him as if you've been leading him on with the dry-humping (and yes, you are still a virgin), but thats just too bad. You have to draw the line RIGHT here if you feel it is against your morals. Trust me, hes in no way worth it. [ NinaB's advice column | Ask NinaB A Question ]
Attention: NOTHING on this site may be reproduced in any fashion whatsoever without explicit consent (in writing) of the owner of said material, unless otherwise stated on the page where the content originated. Search engines are free to index and cache our content. Users who post their account names or personal information in their questions have no expectation of privacy beyond that point for anything they disclose. Questions are otherwise considered anonymous to the general public.