Free AdviceGet Free Advice
Home | Get advice | Give advice | Topics | Columnists | - !START HERE! -
Make Suggestions | Sitemap

Get Advice


Search Questions

Ask A Question

Browse Advice Columnists

Search Advice Columnists

Chat Room

Give Advice

View Questions
Search Questions
Advice Topics

Login

Username:
Password:
Remember me
Register for free!
Lost Password?

Want to give Advice?

Sign Up Now
(It's FREE!)

Miscellaneous

Shirts and Stuff
Page Backgrounds
Make Suggestions
Site News
Link To Us
About Us
Terms of Service
Help/FAQ
Sitemap
Contact Us


Death & morality


Question Posted Saturday June 3 2006, 2:18 am

(This category seemed like the closest fit.)

Is it hypocrisy to oppose capital punishment on moral grounds yet condone war as sometimes being necessary? ... Perhaps _nobody_ has the right to decree death as punishment for a person, but then, doesn't that mean justifying war _by any means_ is a morally indefensible stance?


[ Answer this question ]
Want to answer more questions in the Miscellaneous category?
Maybe give some free advice about: Spirituality?


sbloemeke answered Saturday June 3 2006, 1:08 pm:
It is not because sometimes you oppose the death sentance because of the possibility of innocence, and you favor war because it destroys the guilty (The government's actions are more concrete). Or, the death penalty will kill someone, losing a life, yet war may actually save lives from a government.

By the way, if this helps, I am opposed to the death penalty AND war.

[ sbloemeke's advice column | Ask sbloemeke A Question
]




storageanddisposal answered Saturday June 3 2006, 9:15 am:
I agree with Scribble. It's not necessarily hypocrisy, though I'm fairly against both. There's almost always the possibility of killing someone who was innocent. It's more harsh to kill someone in that than to follow through with war when you no longer have a choice.

"No one has a right to decree death as punishment"

It depends on whether you take war as punishment or defense.

[ storageanddisposal's advice column | Ask storageanddisposal A Question
]



Scribble answered Saturday June 3 2006, 7:04 am:
I'm not sure that it is hypocrisy, only because the two terms- 'war' and 'capital punishment' seem incompatible. I mean, capital punishment is the decision to execute after judgmental process- first the defendant must be found guilty of a crime and then executed, essentially in cold blood, in front of witnesses. War seems like a different kettle of fish entirely. Although I DO see what you mean in comparing the two in that death is essentialy proscribed in both cases, the deaths that occur in in war are not really a form of punishment, are they? Also the decree of death could never be said to be 'for the greater good' in my opinion, whereas it is possible the reasonin for war could be to prevent further loss of life in future.

It was difficult to word my opinions on that one, so I hope I got my meaning across.

[ Scribble's advice column | Ask Scribble A Question
]

More Questions:

<<< Previous Question: idk wat to dooooooooooooo
Next Question >>> Liking

Recent popular questions:
Want to give advice?

Click here to start your own advice column!

What happened here with my gamer friends?

All content on this page posted by members of advicenators.com is the responsibility those individual members. Other content © 2003-2014 advicenators.com. We do not promise accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any advice and are not responsible for content.

Attention: NOTHING on this site may be reproduced in any fashion whatsoever without explicit consent (in writing) of the owner of said material, unless otherwise stated on the page where the content originated. Search engines are free to index and cache our content.
Users who post their account names or personal information in their questions have no expectation of privacy beyond that point for anything they disclose. Questions are otherwise considered anonymous to the general public.

[Valid RSS] eXTReMe Tracker