Question Posted Wednesday September 7 2005, 8:30 pm
i need to know the differences/simularitys for pure science vs. applied science. obvisouly i have no idea what eithor really means, so help would be appreciated =)
[ Answer this question ] Want to answer more questions in the Work & School category? Maybe give some free advice about: School? Scribble answered Thursday September 8 2005, 9:29 am: 'Pure' or 'basic' science is simply the study of something, anything, through scientific observation and experiment. However it is normally taken to mean the study of something for its scientific merit (basically a posh way of saying curiosity. Applied science is using scientific theory to solve a particular problem- e.g. designing a better tennis racket using theories of elasticity. The debate between the two is basically that 'pure science' may not be useful or even productive (you could discover a massive new planet after years of work, but at the end of the day, what was the point?). Applied science is criticised for being motivated only by profit (why build better tennis rackets when the arms lobby will pay you $$$$$ to design enormous rockets?).
Therefore, basic 'pop' difference between the two is pure is motivated by a need for understanding and applied is motivated by the need to solve a specific problem. Personally I don't think there IS a difference between the two, but my reasons for that are another story. [ Scribble's advice column | Ask Scribble A Question ]
Attention: NOTHING on this site may be reproduced in any fashion whatsoever without explicit consent (in writing) of the owner of said material, unless otherwise stated on the page where the content originated. Search engines are free to index and cache our content. Users who post their account names or personal information in their questions have no expectation of privacy beyond that point for anything they disclose. Questions are otherwise considered anonymous to the general public.