|
humorist-workshop
Advicenators discussion: This...
Matt wrote Sunday August 12 2007, 1:54 am:
...is your new topic.
LOL_x0x wrote Sunday August 12 2007, 4:44 pm:
This...is a post in the new topic.
S_C wrote Sunday August 12 2007, 10:18 pm:
This... is a response to a post in the new topic.
Cux wrote Tuesday August 14 2007, 2:54 pm:
This...is a response to a response to a post in the new topic.
Matt wrote Wednesday August 15 2007, 7:17 pm:
This... ends this ridiculousness.
=D
S_C wrote Wednesday August 15 2007, 7:25 pm:
hahaha. Matt is awesome!
I just figure that if it's posted in MY forum it must mean it's true!
Duude, has anyone seen that commerical on TV that goes "Stanley Steemer makes carpet cleaner" Beucase the darn jingle is stuck in my head and bothering me!! haha
Cux wrote Wednesday August 15 2007, 10:14 pm:
Haha- we all have heard it.
LOL_x0x wrote Friday August 17 2007, 12:37 pm:
I liked the question someone asked about the Empire commercial.
Matt wrote Friday August 17 2007, 10:53 pm:
I got a 2 as my rating in a non-abusive answer for that question.
But will a Level 2 Moderator change it for me? Nnnnoooooooo.
S_C wrote Saturday August 18 2007, 2:25 pm:
Liar Liar pants on fire
=]
shh!
Cux wrote Sunday August 19 2007, 3:34 pm:
L2s can't change Matt's ratings?
S_C wrote Monday August 20 2007, 9:42 pm:
[Link](Mouse over link to see full location)
That might help. It has DN's explanation I think.
Cux wrote Tuesday August 21 2007, 12:42 pm:
Oh. I've seen this before- I just forgot about it when I asked..
Matt wrote Tuesday August 21 2007, 1:03 pm:
DN spins a lot, as usual. You might remember the Moderator Discussion Topic of my "leaving". The good old 'turn everyone against your enemy' essay.
I'm well-liked on the site even by his administrators, so why can't he get the hell over himself and start handling real problems on advicenators?
S_C wrote Tuesday August 21 2007, 9:34 pm:
Sometimes he says that we all (as in the adminstrators) know certain things. I think I've been left out of the loop because I don't know half the stuff I guess I'm supposed to know.
I'm pretty sure him and yg keep in contact because she gives us messages from him sometimes. I e-mail him if I need to but I haven't heard much from him except a few bits and pieces of information.
I like you. I agree with him that if you want ratings changed then you need to at least attempt to answer with minimal sarcasm. I actually want to change a rating of yours and if you delete calling them a tool and stupid then I'll bump it to a 3. [Link](Mouse over link to see full location)
I don't see the problem with changing your ratings if you attempt to answer the question nicely, etc. Especially because the user who asked the question was just banned for ratings abuse on another question. If DN doesn't approve then he'll let me know. Or I'll ask him in the near future and figure out his opinion on that. For now though -behave at least a bit better.
Matt wrote Wednesday August 22 2007, 12:43 am:
Ok, I changed it. Besides, I said it made them LOOK stupid, which it did. :/
S_C wrote Wednesday August 22 2007, 8:37 am:
Yeah, I just want to be careful. No need for DN jumping on both of us.
Cux wrote Wednesday August 22 2007, 4:45 pm:
Honestly Matt- you're humor is one of the things that brings me back to this site.
Maybe I'm just on your side because DN hates my guts probably just as much as yours- my wrong-doings were more behind the scenes. And it ticked him off.
Just know that you have at least one fan out there of your answers =D.
Matt wrote Friday August 24 2007, 12:26 am:
Thanks, I appreciate it.
What wrong doings of your are you referring to?
ASAPcamille wrote Friday August 24 2007, 9:46 am:
I love Matt's answers as well. I get so annoyed that I can't file abuse reports when someone gives him a 1- and he actually just said the truth- isnt that what the site is about...?
Cux wrote Friday August 24 2007, 11:49 am:
Ehh, I'll explain that later, Matt.
S_C wrote Friday August 24 2007, 3:47 pm:
Technically we can't change his ratings until he cleans up his act.
As long as he properly answers the question and the person gives him a crap rating for zero reason at all (he doesn't offend them) then I'm pretty sure it's changeable.. at least how I view it.
If I'm going to ban someone for abusive ratings and change all the ratings they give, I wouldn't just ignore Matt's because of who he is. That's not playing fair at all.
Matt wrote Friday August 24 2007, 4:32 pm:
Why can't we use the less than symbol?
LOL_x0x wrote Friday August 24 2007, 6:20 pm:
"Honestly Matt- you're humor is one of the things that brings me back to this site."
Agreed =]
and I don't like less than symbols.
They annoy me. And marbles! @#%^($!
*shudders*
S_C wrote Friday August 24 2007, 11:02 pm:
We can't use the less than symbol because it starts out a code and I guess there is something that doesn't let us do it.
pretty lame huh.
Reply to topicWhoa, hold up there! You have to be logged in to reply to this topic.Register for free!
|