why are all of the animated movies on the big screen computer generated
Question Posted Tuesday June 25 2013, 10:52 pm
um recently the animated films that have been recently released in the theater are only computer generated none of them are hand drawn allthough when they were released in the theater in the 30s 40s 50s 60s 70s 80s 90s and early 2000s they are hand drawn and computer generated so why did hand drawn stop being made
[ Answer this question ] Want to answer more questions in the Hobbies category? Maybe give some free advice about: Theater? rainhorse68 answered Thursday June 27 2013, 12:46 pm: Only high-art type animations are hand-drawn now. Teams of huge numbers of skilled artists would draw the great (early) Disney animations. The costs would be astronomical now. In fact, if you look at the last drawn Disney animations the standard of artwork is way below the 30's to 50's stuff. Look at the changing facial expressions, moving shadows etc on the early stuff. It's amazing. Check the later stuff...crude by comparison. Often just two characters move at a time. CGI scenes are easy and quick by comparison. A character is modelled once, assigned to a moving 'armature' (like a skeleton, all jointed) and various advanced 'dynamics' are applied to the armature...it moves! The first CGI stuff was incredibly expensive. Few people had the software skills, there was still a lot of manual input, and those who could do it commanded a huge fee. But now plenty can do it, and it's far cheaper. Personally I think it's a shame that hand animation is a lost art. Still, look at great cinema, shot on film. Nobody knew quite what they were getting at the time, you couldn't 'live view' like digital media or videotape. They were done with technique and feel. All looks a bit 'shot from the hip' and disposable now by comparison. On the other hand, Eisenstein couldn't have made a movie like 'Avatar'!! And there are some abysmal movies shot on film. There's always room for the best. Any help? I shoot pics (stills) and there was a sort of buzz you got using film...you couldn't review the results at the time like a DSLR does. Technique was king. 36 shots on a roll. Now I (like most!) fire off hundreds a session, 8 frames per second bursts...and sort the good ones out later. Sometimes feel like a chimp could do it these days! Must be getting nostalgic....? [ rainhorse68's advice column | Ask rainhorse68 A Question ]
Attention: NOTHING on this site may be reproduced in any fashion whatsoever without explicit consent (in writing) of the owner of said material, unless otherwise stated on the page where the content originated. Search engines are free to index and cache our content. Users who post their account names or personal information in their questions have no expectation of privacy beyond that point for anything they disclose. Questions are otherwise considered anonymous to the general public.