shortshortSHORT answered Friday March 28 2008, 10:45 am: Veet is much better because it doesn't burn, you don't feel it, and its only there for 3 mins. its really not that big of a deal and you don't have to worry about cuts, but they both do smell. I dont know about other people but for me it takes about 1-2 months for my hair to grow back when i use veet and it is proven to take longer to grow back than shaving. I've never used nair, but i've hear bad things about it, so i would stick with veet to be safe.
italia94 answered Friday March 28 2008, 10:32 am: I've used nair and veet bother before. Personally, veet worked better for me. It is a hassle though. Nair gave me burns on my legs but Veet didn't. I'd go with the veet, honestly. [ italia94's advice column | Ask italia94 A Question ]
kaityxkorea answered Friday March 28 2008, 10:01 am: i don't know.
i've used veet before,
personally it's a big pain. because you have to rub it in wash your hands sit there for like 6 minutes wash it off and it smells really bad.
it works alright, but the hair grows back like super fast so.. I've never used nair before, but it's probably around the same. [ kaityxkorea's advice column | Ask kaityxkorea A Question ]
Attention: NOTHING on this site may be reproduced in any fashion whatsoever without explicit consent (in writing) of the owner of said material, unless otherwise stated on the page where the content originated. Search engines are free to index and cache our content. Users who post their account names or personal information in their questions have no expectation of privacy beyond that point for anything they disclose. Questions are otherwise considered anonymous to the general public.