|
ipods
whats better (not it looks but in quality) the new ipod nano 3rd generation or the new ipod touch? cuz ive heard bad things about both and i really wanna get one of the two
Thanks:)
[ ]
Want to answer more questions in the Miscellaneous category?
Maybe give some free advice about: Random Weirdos?
well, which one can you afford?
anyways i would say the Ipod touch, its nicer looking and you can do like everything you could with a nano
so why not have the latest product?
]
personally i would turn down both (as they have poor memory for the price), and go for teh 80 gig classic, as it functions the same as teh nano, and it has an 800% increase in storage space. even if you don't use all the space for music, you can still use it to back up your computer's harddrive (the 160 gig classic is bigger than my macbook's memory) and transfer information to your friends and whatnot.
but touch beats nano
in memory and functionality
go with touch.
]
In quality, with pricing aside, the iPod Touch would probably make a better choice, because it has all the features the iPod Nano does, can have more capacity than the Nano, and of course has internet. So its basically the iPhone without the phone part. Of course, the quality of the product will depend on how well you maintain it, how you treat its charging cycles, etc. Several factors play a role in the quality of the two, including the quality of the music itself. iPod Touch would probably be better choice, but why not wait until their next model of it comes out? Hope that helped.
]
More Questions: |