Im not going to pretend that I know everything there is to know about every court case ever, but Ive never heard of a law case where this came into question.
If a woman managed to rape a guy and get him to cum inside her, and got pregnant, AND kept the baby, I dont think at that point a court would force child support. The child would more than likely end up a ward of the state in foster care.
theymos answered Sunday August 12 2007, 3:44 pm: No, but women almost always win in cases like that; they would either decide she was raped or that it was consensual. [ theymos's advice column | Ask theymos A Question ]
Cux answered Sunday August 12 2007, 3:43 pm: I'm going to say no, he wouldn't have to. He was raped, meaning it wasn't consensual [both parties agreed]- and therefore- all the blame is placed on the raper, not the raped.
And even if the guy had to- he probably would want anything to do with the baby.
Plus, the type of girls that go out and rape guys and get pregnant probably are the ones who resort to abortion =/.
DepthofHeart answered Sunday August 12 2007, 3:42 pm: First off, I doubt people would believe the guy was raped and not the woman. If the woman who raped the guy said she was raped then they would most likely belive her. If the court does believe that the man was raped or the woman confesses to raping him, he would not have to pay child support for the kid.
Attention: NOTHING on this site may be reproduced in any fashion whatsoever without explicit consent (in writing) of the owner of said material, unless otherwise stated on the page where the content originated. Search engines are free to index and cache our content. Users who post their account names or personal information in their questions have no expectation of privacy beyond that point for anything they disclose. Questions are otherwise considered anonymous to the general public.