Free AdviceGet Free Advice
Home | Get advice | Give advice | Topics | Columnists | - !START HERE! -
Make Suggestions | Sitemap

Get Advice


Search Questions

Ask A Question

Browse Advice Columnists

Search Advice Columnists

Chat Room

Give Advice

View Questions
Search Questions
Advice Topics

Login

Username:
Password:
Remember me
Register for free!
Lost Password?

Want to give Advice?

Sign Up Now
(It's FREE!)

Miscellaneous

Shirts and Stuff
Page Backgrounds
Make Suggestions
Site News
Link To Us
About Us
Terms of Service
Help/FAQ
Sitemap
Contact Us


Harriet Miers


Question Posted Sunday October 9 2005, 4:29 pm

I was wondering..why do so many people disagree on Bush's decision to nominate Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court? I mean, people say she isn't conservative enough..whatever that means...but she's been working in the law business since forevr..Anyway, my question is..why should Harriet Miers be elected..and why shouldn't she?

[ Answer this question ]
Want to answer more questions in the Work & School category?
Maybe give some free advice about: School?


HawttxParadise answered Monday October 10 2005, 5:24 pm:
i think it is based on if they like bush. some well alot of people if the like bush they will agree on everything he says. i personly hate Harriet Miers.

[ HawttxParadise's advice column | Ask HawttxParadise A Question
]




Ivy921 answered Sunday October 9 2005, 6:47 pm:
Here's my opinion as unbiased as possible.... First of all, she wasn't elected nor will she be. She was appointed by Bush and will ultimately be voted onto the bench or not by Congress. There are a few reasons why people on both sides of the aisle don't like her.
1. She has never been a judge. She stands on the brink of being a judge in the most important court in the country and she has never been a judge or had a federal court experience.
2. No one knows where she really stands on things other than what her friends (the President among them) tells us. You'll hear the term 'paper trail' a lot. With judges you can see how they have ruled in the past and infer how they will rule in the future. In her case no one can do this, and this as I mention is the most important court in the country, so maybe people should have an idea where she comes in on issues facing the country.
3. The only thing that she seems to be known for is being Bush's attorney and friend. Is that reason enough to have a job for life on the Supreme Court?
Conservative or not, or regardless of how you feel on a variety of topics, a Supreme court judge will help form laws that could shape the country for generations. You have to decide if the President telling us that she's a good friend is reason enough to want this person on the bench. If you have questions or real concerns, contact your congress person.

[ Ivy921's advice column | Ask Ivy921 A Question
]



shake answered Sunday October 9 2005, 6:02 pm:
All you're going to get on here will be biased answers that all the little kiddies are mocking from their parents. Dont listen to them.

Just do this. Who cares? If she doesnt screw anything up what sucks so much? Nothing.

[ shake's advice column | Ask shake A Question
]



schlichtinator answered Sunday October 9 2005, 5:28 pm:
People on the right say she isn't conservative enough because she doesn't quote scripture and bash liberals.

[ schlichtinator's advice column | Ask schlichtinator A Question
]

More Questions:

<<< Previous Question: best kind of pet?
Next Question >>> broken friendship

Recent popular questions:
Want to give advice?

Click here to start your own advice column!

What happened here with my gamer friends?

All content on this page posted by members of advicenators.com is the responsibility those individual members. Other content © 2003-2014 advicenators.com. We do not promise accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any advice and are not responsible for content.

Attention: NOTHING on this site may be reproduced in any fashion whatsoever without explicit consent (in writing) of the owner of said material, unless otherwise stated on the page where the content originated. Search engines are free to index and cache our content.
Users who post their account names or personal information in their questions have no expectation of privacy beyond that point for anything they disclose. Questions are otherwise considered anonymous to the general public.

[Valid RSS] eXTReMe Tracker