|
Evolution? Intelligent Design?
Do you believe in Intelligent Design or evolution?
If you believe Intelligent Design is an adequate critique of evolution, then tell me what designed the irreducibly complex designer, please. I'd really like to know!
[ ]
Want to answer more questions in the Miscellaneous category?
Maybe give some free advice about: Random Weirdos?
The creator is not alive. He's a spirit. And spirits are neither born nor die. He was not created, he just is. He is everything. He's the ground, the planets, the emptiness, and you. Yes, you are a piece of god. And the creator just made himself different, giving up parts of himself for you.
And everything cannot be created or destroyed, according to the laws of science. So, he didn't need to be created according to science. Actually, God created science for us to better understand his ways.
-Steven
(How in the world did a poll like question get rated a 3?)
]
Intelligent design is another word for creationism.
"Irriducible complexity" is another way of saying "I don't understand how this could have happened, so it must be magic!"
There is no designer.
If you honestly want to learn about evolution, then grab yourself a highschool or college biology textbook. It's not hard to understand, if you're willing to learn. But remember: you're still not going to entirely understand everything. That doesn't mean it's magic, or a miracle; that just means that you're lacking in the areas of chemistry, biochemistry, and biology.
]
Something to chew on...
Let us say for the sake of argument that you borrow a car from the lead engineer at Ford.
Then let us also say that you wreck said car.
You have to answer to the engineer who designed the car you wrecked.
It doesn't matter where he went to school, you still wrecked HIS car.
---
Let us say that you are given a lollypop by a little boy.
It is his favorite flavor, and he really thinks he is doing you a favor by giving it to you.
For some reason you don't like the sight of it, so you rip it out of his hand and stomp his present into the dirt, thereby hurting his feelings as well as making him cry.
He asks you why you did that...
... Let us assume the little boy has a dad ...
So, you have to answer to the person who gave you the lollypop, not his dad. (Aren't you glad?)
As such, I conjecture that we have only to answer to our immediate superior. That is certainly enough for me.
Thanks for reading,
DangerNerd.
P.S. Now it is time for you to explain where the gasses involved in the big bang theory came from. Which one takes more faith to believe?
]
More Questions: |