ok so i joined track yesterday and im not all that bad, but im ot all that good either haha. well, i dont know if i should do sprinting or distance. i cant run too fast and i dont think sprinting would be for me. but im not sure about distance either. does anyone with track experience know what would be easier, distance or sprinting?
When I try and do sprints I'm just not as fast the other people. It doesn't fit me. Or the way I have trained. Though others who have trained specifically for sprinting will most definitly say that sprints are much easier than long distance and they will groan when they have to run the mile while long distance runners see that as no big deal. [ jesusfreak92's advice column | Ask jesusfreak92 A Question ]
TheWallflower answered Wednesday March 21 2007, 11:14 pm: Being able to sprint or run long distance is really determined by the persons genetic make up. Some people have mostly fast twitch muscles which makes them able to sprint better(but are not so good at long distance) and some people have mostly slow twitch muscle fibers which allow them to run long distance(but not so good at sprinting.) People who can do both well are rare.
If you feel like you have strong lungs, then I'd recommend trying long distance. If you're lungs are weak(either because of genetics or bad habits like smoking) I'd recomend sprinting.
Attention: NOTHING on this site may be reproduced in any fashion whatsoever without explicit consent (in writing) of the owner of said material, unless otherwise stated on the page where the content originated. Search engines are free to index and cache our content. Users who post their account names or personal information in their questions have no expectation of privacy beyond that point for anything they disclose. Questions are otherwise considered anonymous to the general public.