Question Posted Thursday December 20 2007, 8:10 pm
i know its in style to wear long shirts with leggings. but what about shorter shirts? like not too shirt, they cover the front, but you can see a little bit of your butt on the back, but of course the leggings cover your butt. is that considered "hoe-ish" or is it in style. sorry its hard to explain haha
uisforukelele answered Friday December 21 2007, 11:43 pm: i would say it looks trashy if the shirt is not at least skirt length in the front and the back. after all, leggings are not real pants so your butt needs to be covered. [ uisforukelele's advice column | Ask uisforukelele A Question ]
LoverButton answered Friday December 21 2007, 2:07 pm: if the shirt doesn't cover your butt don't wear it. it looks trashy.
XxSunshinexX answered Friday December 21 2007, 6:31 am: No I think you could wear it. It has to be like 2/3 of your butt you are fine. Maybe, it would look better if you wore a flowy shirt rather than tighter. [ XxSunshinexX's advice column | Ask XxSunshinexX A Question ]
kym answered Friday December 21 2007, 3:56 am: I live in the UK and lots of girls here wear shorter skirts mainly denim with black leggings and with UGG boots and it looks nice but just dont go to short otherwise you can to the style to trashy, but its a hot look and you should be adverntureous and unique with what you wear. hope this helps [ kym's advice column | Ask kym A Question ]
Attention: NOTHING on this site may be reproduced in any fashion whatsoever without explicit consent (in writing) of the owner of said material, unless otherwise stated on the page where the content originated. Search engines are free to index and cache our content. Users who post their account names or personal information in their questions have no expectation of privacy beyond that point for anything they disclose. Questions are otherwise considered anonymous to the general public.