I live in Florida and the huge debate between if it is ethical or not to prolong the death of Terri Schiavo. I do undertans the concept of fighting over another person's life. Much less the idea of allowing her to starve to death. I have done research and I have found this on Terri Schiavo's condtion: " They are unresponsive to external stimuli, except, possibly, painful stimuli." ([Link](Mouse over link to see full location)). If there is a possibility that she could feel the pain why don't they allow her to pass without pain?? I want to understand the conept of this ethical debate so that I may fully understand the situation at hand.
Attention: NOTHING on this site may be reproduced in any fashion whatsoever without explicit consent (in writing) of the owner of said material, unless otherwise stated on the page where the content originated. Search engines are free to index and cache our content. Users who post their account names or personal information in their questions have no expectation of privacy beyond that point for anything they disclose. Questions are otherwise considered anonymous to the general public.