Personally, I hate this website. The majority of questions are either horribly worded, incredibly easy to answer on one's own with the use of widely available resources (including, but not limited to, www.google.com), alterations of a very common question, or a combination of the three. I confuse myself sometimes as to why I continue to read random questions, only to be to be driven insane by the utter disregard for the reader of the question. Maybe I just use this website as an outlet for my rage towards the section of teenagers who upset me the most, or possibly it is just ingrained in my psyche to read over poorly spelled questions to fuel my masochistic personality. I might even be staying here to prevent the overtake of this hapless corner of the internet by ignorant and lazy teenage girls that don't know how to say "yes" to someone who asked her out by the use of common sense and correct grammar.
I have, however, found that reading topic specific questions eliminates most of my frustration. Of course, that still doesn't stop me from running into unbelievably ignorant questions such as "does doing squats really make your theighs smaller?" in the INTERNET AND WEB DESIGN topic list.
There is also no Part V in the Advicenators Profile Editor. *Member of club AWESOME*
Gender: Male
Age: 18
AIM: bsphil101
Member Since: October 5, 2005
Answers: 287
Last Update: April 30, 2006
Visitors: 10147
|
| |
my questions are simple.
I'd like to see your opinion on my latest moral quandry. hypothetically put yourself in the shoes of a soldier in iraq or afghanistan, you have the fortitude to engage and destroy the average insurgent with whatever weapon you can grab, be it a bayonet, or a mark 19 grenade launcher. you are on patrol in the streets of samarra or some other craphole city, and some 12 year old boy comes around the corner with a PKM(russian assault rifle) and opens up on your squad.
1: would you open fire with the intent to destroy the target, or to injure and disarm?
2:is it right, in a moral sense, to shoot and kill this kid?
those of you who instantly say no are missing the point of this exercise. use quotes if you feel the need.
you fellas that like to act like a box of rubber dicks, please contribute.
you normal civilians are welcome to answer, i just like to let those specific groups know that their opinion, no matter how depraved, is still valuable.
thank you for your time and patience.
-gunner (link)
|
Kill the fucker.
I don't care if you put a glock in the hands of your newborn infant, if he somehow figured out how to fire it, I would blow his head off if he endangered my life. There would be no hesitation on my part to kill.
War is war, and if war is what you want, then you are going to have to deal with that. Innocent civilians will die. Far too much blood will be shed. It's all part of a package deal. If you can't handle the responsibility of voting for war, then don't support it.
|
|
Rating: 5
|
bluntly put. well, i think i know your political alignment. who said i did or did not support it though? I just do what the president tells me to do(within the moral code of the armed forces, don't try to nuremburg that comment)
have a good day, fella. and keep voting!
-gunner
|
|